<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 907 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268098</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed service tax demands of around Rs. 241 crores against the appellant, with penalties, for engineering, procurement, and construction services related to a port project. The appellant&#039;s arguments on vivisection of works contract, exemptions under notifications, and financial hardship were considered. A deposit of Rs. 10 crores was directed under Section 35F, with compliance verification. The appeals were scheduled for a final decision, with stay on recoveries pending compliance verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 907 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268098</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed service tax demands of around Rs. 241 crores against the appellant, with penalties, for engineering, procurement, and construction services related to a port project. The appellant&#039;s arguments on vivisection of works contract, exemptions under notifications, and financial hardship were considered. A deposit of Rs. 10 crores was directed under Section 35F, with compliance verification. The appeals were scheduled for a final decision, with stay on recoveries pending compliance verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>