<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 904 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Reviewing authority&#039;s decision to impose penalties under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994, after the adjudicating authority had waived penalties under Section 80. The Tribunal emphasized that once the original authority decides not to impose penalties under Section 80 based on reasonable cause, the Reviewing authority cannot interfere unless there is evidence of fraud, collusion, or misstatement. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and any consequential relief was directed according to law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 904 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Reviewing authority&#039;s decision to impose penalties under Section 84 of the Finance Act, 1994, after the adjudicating authority had waived penalties under Section 80. The Tribunal emphasized that once the original authority decides not to impose penalties under Section 80 based on reasonable cause, the Reviewing authority cannot interfere unless there is evidence of fraud, collusion, or misstatement. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and any consequential relief was directed according to law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>