https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268086 The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence in proving clandestine activities, highlighting the insufficiency of income disclosure alone for such claims. Relying on legal principles and lack of substantial proof beyond income disclosure, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting relief to the appellant. The decision underscored the importance of robust evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268086 The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence in proving clandestine activities, highlighting the insufficiency of income disclosure alone for such claims. Relying on legal principles and lack of substantial proof beyond income disclosure, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal and granting relief to the appellant. The decision underscored the importance of robust evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal, ultimately leading to the favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268086