<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 888 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the requirement of Rs. 5 lakhs security for renewal of the CHA license under the new Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2013. Despite initial non-compliance leading to license revocation and penalty imposition, the appellant&#039;s challenge was deemed part of the appeal process, not misconduct warranting revocation. The judgment emphasized due process, the right to challenge directives, and compliance with Tribunal orders, resulting in the restoration of the license. Fair treatment and adherence to legal procedures in customs broker licensing regulatory matters were underscored in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2016 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 888 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the requirement of Rs. 5 lakhs security for renewal of the CHA license under the new Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2013. Despite initial non-compliance leading to license revocation and penalty imposition, the appellant&#039;s challenge was deemed part of the appeal process, not misconduct warranting revocation. The judgment emphasized due process, the right to challenge directives, and compliance with Tribunal orders, resulting in the restoration of the license. Fair treatment and adherence to legal procedures in customs broker licensing regulatory matters were underscored in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>