https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268078 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Mulberry Raw Silk imported from China due to grade misdeclaration, confirming the goods as Grade 2A instead of Grade 4A as declared. The appellant's argument based on supplier certificates was rejected, with the Tribunal finding the importer aware of the misdeclaration. While the duty imposition was upheld, the fine and penalty were waived partially, citing a previous decision. The appeal was allowed in part, with the impugned order upheld except for the fine and penalty. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Nov 2015 07:16:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268078 The Tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on Mulberry Raw Silk imported from China due to grade misdeclaration, confirming the goods as Grade 2A instead of Grade 4A as declared. The appellant's argument based on supplier certificates was rejected, with the Tribunal finding the importer aware of the misdeclaration. While the duty imposition was upheld, the fine and penalty were waived partially, citing a previous decision. The appeal was allowed in part, with the impugned order upheld except for the fine and penalty. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268078