<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 884 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by remanding them to the proper officer of Customs in the SEZ at Surat for examination and expeditious disposal of refund claims. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Customs Act provisions and timely resolution of claims, highlighting the importance of following established legal procedures and precedents in determining the jurisdiction of Customs officers in SEZs to sanction customs duty refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 06:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 884 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals by remanding them to the proper officer of Customs in the SEZ at Surat for examination and expeditious disposal of refund claims. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Customs Act provisions and timely resolution of claims, highlighting the importance of following established legal procedures and precedents in determining the jurisdiction of Customs officers in SEZs to sanction customs duty refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>