<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 950 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175396</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that reduced the compensation amount in a motor accident case. The division bench&#039;s judgment restoring the compensation to &amp;amp;8377; 2,55,000/- was reinstated, emphasizing the unsustainability of the review order both in terms of maintainability and merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:52:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 950 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175396</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that reduced the compensation amount in a motor accident case. The division bench&#039;s judgment restoring the compensation to &amp;amp;8377; 2,55,000/- was reinstated, emphasizing the unsustainability of the review order both in terms of maintainability and merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>