https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1167 The court set aside the Commissioner of Customs' order-in-original, allowing the writ petition challenging the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods. Despite the availability of statutory appeal, the court invoked Article 226 jurisdiction, noting the petitioner's lack of opportunity to respond adequately to the show-cause notice. The court emphasized the importance of timely document submission, ordered the petitioner to reply to the notice, and highlighted the partial deposit of the demanded amount. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1167 The court set aside the Commissioner of Customs' order-in-original, allowing the writ petition challenging the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration and undervaluation of imported goods. Despite the availability of statutory appeal, the court invoked Article 226 jurisdiction, noting the petitioner's lack of opportunity to respond adequately to the show-cause notice. The court emphasized the importance of timely document submission, ordered the petitioner to reply to the notice, and highlighted the partial deposit of the demanded amount. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1167