<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1018 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175391</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Company Petition as premature, emphasizing the need for reconciliation and payment from Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) before determining the liability of the respondent company. The judgment highlighted the importance of settling accounts in accordance with contract terms and conditions before seeking relief under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1018 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175391</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Company Petition as premature, emphasizing the need for reconciliation and payment from Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. (HAL) before determining the liability of the respondent company. The judgment highlighted the importance of settling accounts in accordance with contract terms and conditions before seeking relief under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>