https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175389 Lawful sub-letting created with the landlord's written consent did not become unlawful merely because the contractual tenancy later expired. Eviction under section 13(2)(ii)(a) required sub-letting without written consent at the time it was created, and the Court rejected the alleged later sub-tenancy for lack of reliable evidence, including insufficient proof from a tape-recorded conversation. The continued possession of lawfully inducted sub-tenants after expiry of the tenancy was not treated as a fresh or wrongful sub-letting, so the statutory ground for eviction was not established. en-us Wed, 07 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Nov 2015 16:58:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175389 Lawful sub-letting created with the landlord's written consent did not become unlawful merely because the contractual tenancy later expired. Eviction under section 13(2)(ii)(a) required sub-letting without written consent at the time it was created, and the Court rejected the alleged later sub-tenancy for lack of reliable evidence, including insufficient proof from a tape-recorded conversation. The continued possession of lawfully inducted sub-tenants after expiry of the tenancy was not treated as a fresh or wrongful sub-letting, so the statutory ground for eviction was not established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175389