<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 201 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175385</link>
    <description>Leave was granted in the special leave petitions, but no interim stay was ordered. The appeals were directed to be heard on the existing SLP paper books, and the parties were permitted to file additional documents if required. The order is procedural only and records the Supreme Court&#039;s case-management directions without deciding the substantive central excise issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 201 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175385</link>
      <description>Leave was granted in the special leave petitions, but no interim stay was ordered. The appeals were directed to be heard on the existing SLP paper books, and the parties were permitted to file additional documents if required. The order is procedural only and records the Supreme Court&#039;s case-management directions without deciding the substantive central excise issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>