https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175378 Binding precedent controlled the claim to enhanced land acquisition compensation, so the respondents could not invoke the amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court applied the earlier decision as governing authority and confined the relief to the entitlement already settled there. As a result, solatium remained at 15% and interest at 6% on the enhanced compensation from the date of taking possession until deposit, and the broader claim to amended statutory benefits failed. en-us Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:42:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175378 Binding precedent controlled the claim to enhanced land acquisition compensation, so the respondents could not invoke the amended provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court applied the earlier decision as governing authority and confined the relief to the entitlement already settled there. As a result, solatium remained at 15% and interest at 6% on the enhanced compensation from the date of taking possession until deposit, and the broader claim to amended statutory benefits failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175378