<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1932 (4) TMI 13 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175371</link>
    <description>The Privy Council allowed the appeal, restoring the order of the Assistant Commissioner dated 25th April 1927, insofar as it relates to the disallowed deduction for bad debts. The Council emphasized that the determination of bad debts is a factual question to be decided by the appropriate tribunal and not solely by the assessee. No costs were awarded for this appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1932 (4) TMI 13 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175371</link>
      <description>The Privy Council allowed the appeal, restoring the order of the Assistant Commissioner dated 25th April 1927, insofar as it relates to the disallowed deduction for bad debts. The Council emphasized that the determination of bad debts is a factual question to be decided by the appropriate tribunal and not solely by the assessee. No costs were awarded for this appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 1932 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>