<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 148 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175362</link>
    <description>The appeals were accepted, and the orders dismissing objections were set aside. The entire auction proceedings were deemed without jurisdiction, leading to the cancellation of the sale certificate and warrant of possession. Each party was directed to bear their own costs, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:29:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 148 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175362</link>
      <description>The appeals were accepted, and the orders dismissing objections were set aside. The entire auction proceedings were deemed without jurisdiction, leading to the cancellation of the sale certificate and warrant of possession. Each party was directed to bear their own costs, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>