https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1161 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal by setting aside the Commissioner's order attaching a factory premises for duty, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal directed a fresh consideration of the new evidence presented by Mr. Harishchandra Gupta regarding his ownership claim over the property. Emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and proper evaluation of evidence in property ownership disputes, the Tribunal ordered a reevaluation based on all relevant documents, ensuring a just outcome in the matter. en-us Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1161 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal by setting aside the Commissioner's order attaching a factory premises for duty, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal directed a fresh consideration of the new evidence presented by Mr. Harishchandra Gupta regarding his ownership claim over the property. Emphasizing the importance of a fair hearing and proper evaluation of evidence in property ownership disputes, the Tribunal ordered a reevaluation based on all relevant documents, ensuring a just outcome in the matter. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1161