<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 812 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the assessee a stay on assessment proceedings under sections 143(3)/263 of the Income Tax Act until 30th September 2010 or the disposal of pending appeals, emphasizing that an invalid exercise of the Commissioner&#039;s powers under section 263 would render any consequential order invalid. The Tribunal acknowledged its inherent power to grant stays and allowed the assessee&#039;s stay applications. The assessee&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 was based on the argument that it was influenced by higher authorities and constituted a mere change of opinion, not warranting revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:00:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 812 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the assessee a stay on assessment proceedings under sections 143(3)/263 of the Income Tax Act until 30th September 2010 or the disposal of pending appeals, emphasizing that an invalid exercise of the Commissioner&#039;s powers under section 263 would render any consequential order invalid. The Tribunal acknowledged its inherent power to grant stays and allowed the assessee&#039;s stay applications. The assessee&#039;s challenge to the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 was based on the argument that it was influenced by higher authorities and constituted a mere change of opinion, not warranting revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>