<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 864 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple issues. It classified interest income as business income, limited the disallowance under Section 14A, allowed interest expenditure as a business expense, excluded administrative and selling expenses from work-in-progress, and corrected the error in taxing short term capital gain twice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 06:39:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 864 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple issues. It classified interest income as business income, limited the disallowance under Section 14A, allowed interest expenditure as a business expense, excluded administrative and selling expenses from work-in-progress, and corrected the error in taxing short term capital gain twice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>