<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 847 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268038</link>
    <description>Service tax was held payable on the services rendered, and the assessee was found entitled to the benefit of the Board&#039;s Circular dated 31 October 1996. On that basis, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for recalculation of duty and left personal penalty for reconsideration by that authority. Given the limited relief granted and the remand nature of the order, interference was declined. The Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 847 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268038</link>
      <description>Service tax was held payable on the services rendered, and the assessee was found entitled to the benefit of the Board&#039;s Circular dated 31 October 1996. On that basis, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for recalculation of duty and left personal penalty for reconsideration by that authority. Given the limited relief granted and the remand nature of the order, interference was declined. The Department&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>