https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268021 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the demand for interest and penalty imposed by the lower authorities. The tribunal found that the appellant had complied with the debonding process as approved by the Development Commissioner, reversing the credit on the appropriate date. The adjudicating authority's error in determining the debonding date led to the favorable outcome for the appellant, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside. en-us Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Apr 2020 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268021 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the demand for interest and penalty imposed by the lower authorities. The tribunal found that the appellant had complied with the debonding process as approved by the Development Commissioner, reversing the credit on the appropriate date. The adjudicating authority's error in determining the debonding date led to the favorable outcome for the appellant, resulting in the appeal being allowed and the impugned order set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268021