<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268020</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on steel items used to fabricate a storage tank, sugar grader and boiler supports, as they formed inputs for capital goods or integral structural components. A small portion of credit was conceded and ordered to be reversed with interest. Where the dispute concerned interpretative eligibility to credit, penalty was held not leviable. The assessee therefore succeeded on the substantive credit issue, subject to reversal of the disallowed amount with interest, and avoided penal consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 829 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268020</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held admissible on steel items used to fabricate a storage tank, sugar grader and boiler supports, as they formed inputs for capital goods or integral structural components. A small portion of credit was conceded and ordered to be reversed with interest. Where the dispute concerned interpretative eligibility to credit, penalty was held not leviable. The assessee therefore succeeded on the substantive credit issue, subject to reversal of the disallowed amount with interest, and avoided penal consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>