https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268013 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the Respondent. The appeal centered on the incorrect naming of the Respondent and the denial of CENVAT Credit on capital goods. The Tribunal found no reason to intervene, citing consistency with a previous Tribunal order in the Respondent's case. The decision emphasized judicial discipline and the application of precedent in similar cases, ultimately ruling in favor of the Respondent. en-us Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268013 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in favor of the Respondent. The appeal centered on the incorrect naming of the Respondent and the denial of CENVAT Credit on capital goods. The Tribunal found no reason to intervene, citing consistency with a previous Tribunal order in the Respondent's case. The decision emphasized judicial discipline and the application of precedent in similar cases, ultimately ruling in favor of the Respondent. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268013