https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175351 A plaint filed in the firm name of a partnership carrying on business outside India was treated as a misdescription of the partners, not a nullity. The court reasoned that the firm name operated as a compendious description of the partners collectively, so the defect could be cured by amendment under procedural powers. Substituting the individual partners was therefore not regarded as the addition of new plaintiffs in substance, and limitation did not bar the correction. The authority given to file and verify the plaint was also held sufficient. en-us Fri, 07 Oct 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:19:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175351 A plaint filed in the firm name of a partnership carrying on business outside India was treated as a misdescription of the partners, not a nullity. The court reasoned that the firm name operated as a compendious description of the partners collectively, so the defect could be cured by amendment under procedural powers. Substituting the individual partners was therefore not regarded as the addition of new plaintiffs in substance, and limitation did not bar the correction. The authority given to file and verify the plaint was also held sufficient. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Oct 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175351