<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 51 -  CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1150</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, ruled in favor of the assessee on the issues of production incentive compensation and cenvat credit reversal, while deciding against the inclusion of remuneration for inspection in the assessable value. The Tribunal held that the production incentive was not related to manufacturing and should not be included, and that inspection charges paid by the buyer were not part of the assessable value. The judgment emphasized contractual obligations, buyer&#039;s optionality, and the importance of clarity in show cause notices for determining assessable values and duty liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 51 -  CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1150</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, ruled in favor of the assessee on the issues of production incentive compensation and cenvat credit reversal, while deciding against the inclusion of remuneration for inspection in the assessable value. The Tribunal held that the production incentive was not related to manufacturing and should not be included, and that inspection charges paid by the buyer were not part of the assessable value. The judgment emphasized contractual obligations, buyer&#039;s optionality, and the importance of clarity in show cause notices for determining assessable values and duty liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>