<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 942 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175339</link>
    <description>Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST depended on whether sales tax had been paid on the material component, and the Tribunal treated the issue in light of an earlier similar precedent. The denial of the notification benefit was not sustained as final, because the Commissioner had to reconsider the claim after giving the appellant an opportunity to produce evidence of sales tax payment on the material components. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision in accordance with the cited precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:14:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 942 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175339</link>
      <description>Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 12/2003-ST depended on whether sales tax had been paid on the material component, and the Tribunal treated the issue in light of an earlier similar precedent. The denial of the notification benefit was not sustained as final, because the Commissioner had to reconsider the claim after giving the appellant an opportunity to produce evidence of sales tax payment on the material components. The matter was therefore remanded for fresh decision in accordance with the cited precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>