https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175338 An application under section 57(8) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is treated as an application for a new permit only for procedural purposes; if allowed, the variation does not itself create a new permit. The Court also held that increasing trips or vehicles under an existing inter-State stage carriage permit does not offend the Kolar Pocket Scheme or section 68-FF, because the scheme only restricts operation on the notified overlapping stretch, not the continuation of the existing permit on that route. The rejection of the variation application was therefore unlawful, and the permit variation was upheld. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175338 An application under section 57(8) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is treated as an application for a new permit only for procedural purposes; if allowed, the variation does not itself create a new permit. The Court also held that increasing trips or vehicles under an existing inter-State stage carriage permit does not offend the Kolar Pocket Scheme or section 68-FF, because the scheme only restricts operation on the notified overlapping stretch, not the continuation of the existing permit on that route. The rejection of the variation application was therefore unlawful, and the permit variation was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175338