https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175327 In preventive detention under COFEPOSA, a detention order supported by at least one relevant, definite and proximate ground can survive even if other recitals are not fully mirrored in the grounds, because Section 5-A applies severability to sustain valid grounds. The note also addresses alleged non-application of mind, delay in considering representations, and challenges based on communication and non-placement of material; on the stated facts, the Court treated the detention process as sufficiently scrutinised, found no unconstitutional delay, and accepted that contemporaneous English correspondence and the missing CHA licence suspension order did not vitiate subjective satisfaction. en-us Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175327 In preventive detention under COFEPOSA, a detention order supported by at least one relevant, definite and proximate ground can survive even if other recitals are not fully mirrored in the grounds, because Section 5-A applies severability to sustain valid grounds. The note also addresses alleged non-application of mind, delay in considering representations, and challenges based on communication and non-placement of material; on the stated facts, the Court treated the detention process as sufficiently scrutinised, found no unconstitutional delay, and accepted that contemporaneous English correspondence and the missing CHA licence suspension order did not vitiate subjective satisfaction. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175327