<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 664 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175327</link>
    <description>Section 5-A of COFEPOSA preserves a preventive detention order where at least one relevant, definite and proximate ground independently supports detention, even if other statutory recitals are not separately reflected in the grounds. Detention based on abetment of smuggling and harbouring persons engaged in smuggling was sustained because the material showed coordinated export-related activity. Expeditious processing of proposals and representations, without supine indifference or callous inaction, did not establish unconstitutional delay. English-language grounds were treated as effectively communicated where contemporaneous correspondence showed workable English knowledge. Suspension of a CHA licence was not vital material where subjective satisfaction rested on participation in organised prejudicial activity and propensity to continue it through others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 664 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175327</link>
      <description>Section 5-A of COFEPOSA preserves a preventive detention order where at least one relevant, definite and proximate ground independently supports detention, even if other statutory recitals are not separately reflected in the grounds. Detention based on abetment of smuggling and harbouring persons engaged in smuggling was sustained because the material showed coordinated export-related activity. Expeditious processing of proposals and representations, without supine indifference or callous inaction, did not establish unconstitutional delay. English-language grounds were treated as effectively communicated where contemporaneous correspondence showed workable English knowledge. Suspension of a CHA licence was not vital material where subjective satisfaction rested on participation in organised prejudicial activity and propensity to continue it through others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>