https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175323 Preventive detention was sustained where the authority relied on proximate and repeated forest offences involving felling, transport and smuggling of red sanders wood, treated as habitual prejudicial conduct rather than stray incidents. The Court accepted that ordinary criminal law was inadequate on the materials and that subjective satisfaction was properly formed on the gravity and continuity of the conduct. It also held that prior custody did not invalidate the order because the authority was aware of the detention, had reliable material indicating a real possibility of bail, and considered preventive detention necessary to avert further prejudicial acts. The challenge failed on both grounds. en-us Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2015 22:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175323 Preventive detention was sustained where the authority relied on proximate and repeated forest offences involving felling, transport and smuggling of red sanders wood, treated as habitual prejudicial conduct rather than stray incidents. The Court accepted that ordinary criminal law was inadequate on the materials and that subjective satisfaction was properly formed on the gravity and continuity of the conduct. It also held that prior custody did not invalidate the order because the authority was aware of the detention, had reliable material indicating a real possibility of bail, and considered preventive detention necessary to avert further prejudicial acts. The challenge failed on both grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175323