https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175320 Prior arrest and the filing of ordinary criminal proceedings did not, by themselves, bar preventive detention where the detaining authority had relevant material to reach valid satisfaction that detention was necessary. The petitioner was not shown to be in custody in a manner that prevented such satisfaction when the order was passed, so the detention order was not invalid on that ground. The incidents relied upon involved violent acts, including bomb explosions and killings, aimed at terrorising the local population and disrupting normal life; they therefore affected the community at large and concerned public order, not merely law and order. The detention order was upheld and the petition dismissed. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:27:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175320 Prior arrest and the filing of ordinary criminal proceedings did not, by themselves, bar preventive detention where the detaining authority had relevant material to reach valid satisfaction that detention was necessary. The petitioner was not shown to be in custody in a manner that prevented such satisfaction when the order was passed, so the detention order was not invalid on that ground. The incidents relied upon involved violent acts, including bomb explosions and killings, aimed at terrorising the local population and disrupting normal life; they therefore affected the community at large and concerned public order, not merely law and order. The detention order was upheld and the petition dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Aug 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175320