https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175316 Preventive detention may survive a delay challenge where the proposal is continuously processed, the record is voluminous, and the time taken is satisfactorily explained by scrutiny at different stages; the detention was treated as not stale. Independent consideration of the proposal, later materials, and grounds by the detaining authority negates a plea of mechanical adoption of a predecessor's draft; the detention was not vitiated on that basis. Article 22(5) is not breached where the detenu is shown to understand English and translated copies are supplied promptly on request; service of English documents was therefore treated as sufficient. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175316 Preventive detention may survive a delay challenge where the proposal is continuously processed, the record is voluminous, and the time taken is satisfactorily explained by scrutiny at different stages; the detention was treated as not stale. Independent consideration of the proposal, later materials, and grounds by the detaining authority negates a plea of mechanical adoption of a predecessor's draft; the detention was not vitiated on that basis. Article 22(5) is not breached where the detenu is shown to understand English and translated copies are supplied promptly on request; service of English documents was therefore treated as sufficient. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175316