<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 536 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175309</link>
    <description>A fresh preventive detention order is vitiated where the detaining authority relies on an earlier detention order that has already been quashed, because such an order ceases to exist in law and cannot form part of the subjective satisfaction under the COFEPOSA Act. The impermissible reliance on the set-aside order tainted the decision-making process even though additional fresh facts were also referred to, as those facts did not cure the defect created by use of non-existent material. The fresh detention order was therefore invalid and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:35:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 536 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175309</link>
      <description>A fresh preventive detention order is vitiated where the detaining authority relies on an earlier detention order that has already been quashed, because such an order ceases to exist in law and cannot form part of the subjective satisfaction under the COFEPOSA Act. The impermissible reliance on the set-aside order tainted the decision-making process even though additional fresh facts were also referred to, as those facts did not cure the defect created by use of non-existent material. The fresh detention order was therefore invalid and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>