<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 810 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268001</link>
    <description>A medicinal formulation qualified for concessional excise duty where it contained even one bulk drug specified in the notification&#039;s table, because the definition of &quot;formulation&quot; covered medicaments processed out of or containing one or more bulk drugs. The benefit was not limited to formulations containing all bulk drugs listed against the relevant entry, and the other notification conditions still had to be satisfied. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the notification was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 810 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268001</link>
      <description>A medicinal formulation qualified for concessional excise duty where it contained even one bulk drug specified in the notification&#039;s table, because the definition of &quot;formulation&quot; covered medicaments processed out of or containing one or more bulk drugs. The benefit was not limited to formulations containing all bulk drugs listed against the relevant entry, and the other notification conditions still had to be satisfied. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the notification was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>