https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175306 Additional material may be supplied in support of preventive detention grounds, but Article 22(5) requires that the detenu be informed in a clear and effective manner of its purpose and intended use. Where documents are furnished casually, without a covering explanation showing who sent them, why they were supplied, and that they would be considered by the Advisory Board and the Government, the constitutional safeguard of an effective representation is impaired. The Court held that such disclosure can violate Article 22(5), and the detention order was quashed because the detenu's right to make a timely and meaningful representation was not properly preserved. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175306 Additional material may be supplied in support of preventive detention grounds, but Article 22(5) requires that the detenu be informed in a clear and effective manner of its purpose and intended use. Where documents are furnished casually, without a covering explanation showing who sent them, why they were supplied, and that they would be considered by the Advisory Board and the Government, the constitutional safeguard of an effective representation is impaired. The Court held that such disclosure can violate Article 22(5), and the detention order was quashed because the detenu's right to make a timely and meaningful representation was not properly preserved. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175306