<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 49 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants based on the interpretation of CPU, main storage, and classification under CTH 847150.00. The judgment emphasized the importance of RAM as main storage, the core role of CPU in a computer, and the practicality of high-end machines with external storage units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 49 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellants based on the interpretation of CPU, main storage, and classification under CTH 847150.00. The judgment emphasized the importance of RAM as main storage, the core role of CPU in a computer, and the practicality of high-end machines with external storage units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>