<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175302</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the habeas corpus petition, setting aside the detention order dated 15.6.2005 due to substantial discrepancies in the documents relied upon by the detaining authority, indicating a lack of application of mind. The Court emphasized that these discrepancies were fundamental flaws in the detention process, not mere typographical errors, and concluded that the detention order was vitiated. The petitioner/detenu was ordered to be immediately released unless needed in connection with any other case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 609 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175302</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the habeas corpus petition, setting aside the detention order dated 15.6.2005 due to substantial discrepancies in the documents relied upon by the detaining authority, indicating a lack of application of mind. The Court emphasized that these discrepancies were fundamental flaws in the detention process, not mere typographical errors, and concluded that the detention order was vitiated. The petitioner/detenu was ordered to be immediately released unless needed in connection with any other case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>