<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 801 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267992</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court reiterated that Section 80P(4) of the Income-tax Act withdraws deduction only from co-operative banks carrying on banking business under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and not from a credit co-operative society governed by its bye-laws. It accepted that the legislative purpose of the provision was to exclude co-operative banks exclusively engaged in banking, while preserving the deduction for societies that provide credit facilities to their members. On that basis, lending activity to members continued to fall within Section 80P(2)(a)(i), and the society remained entitled to the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:37:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 801 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267992</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court reiterated that Section 80P(4) of the Income-tax Act withdraws deduction only from co-operative banks carrying on banking business under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and not from a credit co-operative society governed by its bye-laws. It accepted that the legislative purpose of the provision was to exclude co-operative banks exclusively engaged in banking, while preserving the deduction for societies that provide credit facilities to their members. On that basis, lending activity to members continued to fall within Section 80P(2)(a)(i), and the society remained entitled to the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>