<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 799 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267990</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not leviable. The Court emphasized the importance of clear notices in penalty proceedings and affirmed the absence of concealment or inaccurate reporting of income by the assessee. Finding no legal grounds for interference, the Court dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 799 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267990</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and holding that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not leviable. The Court emphasized the importance of clear notices in penalty proceedings and affirmed the absence of concealment or inaccurate reporting of income by the assessee. Finding no legal grounds for interference, the Court dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>