<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 8 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1142</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit was held admissible under Rule 5 where credit remained unutilised during the relevant period and could not be adjusted against clearances. The Tribunal treated Rule 5 as enabling refund of credit that cannot be set off, and rejected the view that mere availability of future utilisation defeats the claim. On that basis, the refund rejection was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 8 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1142</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit was held admissible under Rule 5 where credit remained unutilised during the relevant period and could not be adjusted against clearances. The Tribunal treated Rule 5 as enabling refund of credit that cannot be set off, and rejected the view that mere availability of future utilisation defeats the claim. On that basis, the refund rejection was unsustainable and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>