<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 772 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of Cenvat credit on &#039;bright bars&#039; used as inputs. Despite conflicting interpretations by the Department, the Tribunal held that if duty was paid on the input and used in manufacturing, credit cannot be denied based on the manufacturing process. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the appellant relief, emphasizing the validity of the duty paid on &#039;bright bars&#039; used in the production process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 772 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of Cenvat credit on &#039;bright bars&#039; used as inputs. Despite conflicting interpretations by the Department, the Tribunal held that if duty was paid on the input and used in manufacturing, credit cannot be denied based on the manufacturing process. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal granted the appellant relief, emphasizing the validity of the duty paid on &#039;bright bars&#039; used in the production process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>