<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 767 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267958</link>
    <description>Penalty is not warranted where the Cenvat credit itself is otherwise admissible and the dispute over credit is not contested; the note states that the credit related to inputs used to manufacture and install a furnace treated as capital goods, so penalty was set aside. Interest cannot be revived in appeal where the adjudicating authority had expressly dropped the interest demand and the Revenue filed no appeal, because that part of the order had attained finality. The note also records that the voluntarily paid credit demand remained undisturbed, while relief was granted from penalty and the appellate interest demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 767 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267958</link>
      <description>Penalty is not warranted where the Cenvat credit itself is otherwise admissible and the dispute over credit is not contested; the note states that the credit related to inputs used to manufacture and install a furnace treated as capital goods, so penalty was set aside. Interest cannot be revived in appeal where the adjudicating authority had expressly dropped the interest demand and the Revenue filed no appeal, because that part of the order had attained finality. The note also records that the voluntarily paid credit demand remained undisturbed, while relief was granted from penalty and the appellate interest demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>