<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 764 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267955</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition seeking enforcement of a facility notice for container movement operations, ruling that the dispute over additional charges between importers and shipping lines was contractual in nature and fell outside the purview of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that the Customs Officers could not intervene in private contractual matters and concluded that the relief sought by the petitioners could not be granted. The respondents assured compliance with the facility notice, leading to the disposal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 764 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267955</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition seeking enforcement of a facility notice for container movement operations, ruling that the dispute over additional charges between importers and shipping lines was contractual in nature and fell outside the purview of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court held that the Customs Officers could not intervene in private contractual matters and concluded that the relief sought by the petitioners could not be granted. The respondents assured compliance with the facility notice, leading to the disposal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>