<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267951</link>
    <description>The Writ Court initially stayed the suspension order of the Customs Broker license until the appeal was decided by the CESTAT. However, after a mention without a proper application by the appellant&#039;s counsel, the court modified its order, directing the appellant to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within one month. The court found the modified order to be just and proper, declining to interfere with it. As a result, the writ appeal was dismissed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 760 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267951</link>
      <description>The Writ Court initially stayed the suspension order of the Customs Broker license until the appeal was decided by the CESTAT. However, after a mention without a proper application by the appellant&#039;s counsel, the court modified its order, directing the appellant to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within one month. The court found the modified order to be just and proper, declining to interfere with it. As a result, the writ appeal was dismissed, and the connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>