https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267950 Disputed identity of imported goods prevented the High Court from directing release in writ jurisdiction, because customs authorities treated the articles as possible antiques over 100 years old and the import declaration did not match the description of the goods. On that basis, the Court declined to order interim release and left the customs dispute for adjudication. To reduce hardship from demurrage, it directed the customs authority to complete adjudication within two months, provided the petitioner cooperated with the process. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jan 2016 12:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267950 Disputed identity of imported goods prevented the High Court from directing release in writ jurisdiction, because customs authorities treated the articles as possible antiques over 100 years old and the import declaration did not match the description of the goods. On that basis, the Court declined to order interim release and left the customs dispute for adjudication. To reduce hardship from demurrage, it directed the customs authority to complete adjudication within two months, provided the petitioner cooperated with the process. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267950