<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 754 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267945</link>
    <description>A taxable transfer of the right to use intangible goods arises only when the transferee obtains effective commercial control and unrestricted use of the brand or other intangible property. On the beer franchise arrangement, the contract bottling units were captive manufacturers acting under the assessee&#039;s specifications and control, with no independent right to exploit the brand; that receipt was therefore not liable to sales tax. On the packaged drinking water arrangement, the licensee dealers were allowed to use and commercially exploit the Kingfisher mark on royalty, so effective control passed and the royalty was taxable under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 754 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267945</link>
      <description>A taxable transfer of the right to use intangible goods arises only when the transferee obtains effective commercial control and unrestricted use of the brand or other intangible property. On the beer franchise arrangement, the contract bottling units were captive manufacturers acting under the assessee&#039;s specifications and control, with no independent right to exploit the brand; that receipt was therefore not liable to sales tax. On the packaged drinking water arrangement, the licensee dealers were allowed to use and commercially exploit the Kingfisher mark on royalty, so effective control passed and the royalty was taxable under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>