https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175295 Finality of an earlier appellate refusal to reopen a landlord's bona fide requirement prevents later reliance on subsequent events to revive that concluded issue. The discussion treats the refusal to formulate a substantial question of law as closing the issue for the second appeal. It also explains that subletting may arise where a tenant withdraws from effective possession and business management and permits another person, including a close relative, to independently control the non-residential premises. Familial relationship alone does not negate subletting where control has substantively passed from the tenant to the occupant. These principles support sustaining eviction on landlord's requirement and subletting grounds. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:31:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175295 Finality of an earlier appellate refusal to reopen a landlord's bona fide requirement prevents later reliance on subsequent events to revive that concluded issue. The discussion treats the refusal to formulate a substantial question of law as closing the issue for the second appeal. It also explains that subletting may arise where a tenant withdraws from effective possession and business management and permits another person, including a close relative, to independently control the non-residential premises. Familial relationship alone does not negate subletting where control has substantively passed from the tenant to the occupant. These principles support sustaining eviction on landlord's requirement and subletting grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175295