https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175294 Khorposh grants arising from a family compromise were treated as bona fide transactions because the surrounding compromise terms and contemporaneous correspondence supported their genuineness, and the material did not justify a finding that they were created to defeat the Bihar Land Reforms Act or secure higher compensation. On Section 4(h), the required administrative satisfaction was held to depend on a jurisdictional fact: the transfer had to be shown to have the prohibited object, and that foundational fact was open to certiorari review. The statute required objective satisfaction based on adequate material, not a subjective or arbitrary conclusion, so the cancellation orders and surrender direction were quashed. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:26:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175294 Khorposh grants arising from a family compromise were treated as bona fide transactions because the surrounding compromise terms and contemporaneous correspondence supported their genuineness, and the material did not justify a finding that they were created to defeat the Bihar Land Reforms Act or secure higher compensation. On Section 4(h), the required administrative satisfaction was held to depend on a jurisdictional fact: the transfer had to be shown to have the prohibited object, and that foundational fact was open to certiorari review. The statute required objective satisfaction based on adequate material, not a subjective or arbitrary conclusion, so the cancellation orders and surrender direction were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Oct 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175294