<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (9) TMI 10 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175291</link>
    <description>In preventive detention matters, the detaining authority must strictly communicate the grounds and particulars within a reasonable time and with enough detail to enable an effective representation; vague or incomplete disclosure is insufficient, and non-compliance ordinarily makes further detention unlawful from the date of default. The original detention order is not automatically void ab initio unless the deficiency shows that the order itself was not bona fide or was otherwise bad. The Court may test whether the statutory satisfaction in fact existed, but it cannot reappraise the objective reasonableness of the material on which that subjective satisfaction was based.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 17:10:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (9) TMI 10 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175291</link>
      <description>In preventive detention matters, the detaining authority must strictly communicate the grounds and particulars within a reasonable time and with enough detail to enable an effective representation; vague or incomplete disclosure is insufficient, and non-compliance ordinarily makes further detention unlawful from the date of default. The original detention order is not automatically void ab initio unless the deficiency shows that the order itself was not bona fide or was otherwise bad. The Court may test whether the statutory satisfaction in fact existed, but it cannot reappraise the objective reasonableness of the material on which that subjective satisfaction was based.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>