<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1117 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowed short-term capital loss on mutual fund units under section 94(7), emphasizing the retrospective nature of the amendment. However, the appeal was partly allowed concerning the disallowed business expenses, with the Tribunal directing a reassessment by the Assessing Officer based on the detailed justifications provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:20:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1117 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the disallowed short-term capital loss on mutual fund units under section 94(7), emphasizing the retrospective nature of the amendment. However, the appeal was partly allowed concerning the disallowed business expenses, with the Tribunal directing a reassessment by the Assessing Officer based on the detailed justifications provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>