<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1387 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175280</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that authorities must adhere to original court orders based on compromise memorandums, emphasizing the significance of honoring and implementing such agreements to uphold the rule of law. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s decision and directed compliance with the original settlement terms, particularly regarding the location of alternative site allotment, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1387 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175280</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that authorities must adhere to original court orders based on compromise memorandums, emphasizing the significance of honoring and implementing such agreements to uphold the rule of law. The Court set aside the High Court&#039;s decision and directed compliance with the original settlement terms, particularly regarding the location of alternative site allotment, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>