<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 931 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) based on the argument that the embroidery work qualified as a manufacturing process, as supported by relevant legal interpretations and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:59:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 931 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal against the disallowance of additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) based on the argument that the embroidery work qualified as a manufacturing process, as supported by relevant legal interpretations and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>