https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267914 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a service tax dispute regarding non-remittance for providing Franchise Service in 2011-12. The appellant had complied with pre-deposit requirements, remitting the entire demanded amount, leading to a waiver of the balance demand. The Tribunal granted a stay on recovery proceedings during the appeal process, considering the sufficiency of the deposited amount and the appellant's actions in addressing the service tax issues. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Nov 2015 05:54:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267914 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a service tax dispute regarding non-remittance for providing Franchise Service in 2011-12. The appellant had complied with pre-deposit requirements, remitting the entire demanded amount, leading to a waiver of the balance demand. The Tribunal granted a stay on recovery proceedings during the appeal process, considering the sufficiency of the deposited amount and the appellant's actions in addressing the service tax issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 01 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267914